The GHG Blog is just the tip of the iceberg. Check out the Point for complete access to all content from GHG experts.
- After Hours
- Agent Oversight
- Brain Food
- Health Insurance Exchanges
- Part D
- Performance Optimization
- Policy & Health Reform
- Prospective Evaluations
- Provider Relations
- Risk Adjustment
- Sales & Marketing
- Star Ratings
- R. Pennypacker on Compliance Highlights of the CY 2017 Draft Call Letter
- Kathleen Chapman on Is Value-Based Insurance Design All It’s Cracked Up To Be?
- Tracy Croxon on Compliance Highlights of the CY 2017 Draft Call Letter
- Ted Rever on Final Rule: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2017
- Mindy Walker on Sales 2017 Readiness – Are You Maximizing Your Sales Potential Today?
Tag Archives: risk adjustment
In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will start to transition from utilizing Risk Adjustment Processing System (RAPS) files, to support the Medicare risk adjustment payment, to encounter files. The transition process is gradual, with a weighted percentage being taken for 2016: 10 percent based on the encounter files and 90 percent based on the RAPS files. With this transition, it is critical that health plans ensure that their RAPS files and Encounter files are in sync. Oh- and the vendors are on the hook for this too.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) made a tremendous impact on the healthcare industry. What was once a free-flowing commercial market with very low requirements and data interaction has now transformed—it has morphed into a highly-regulated market heavily dependent on data to deliver quality outcomes for members and to remain financially sound. The processes set forth in the ACA mirror existing Medicare processes with adjustments in order to make the processes work for the Commercial population.
Now that you have digested the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) announcement on the proposed demonstration for high-value benefit designs, the clock is ticking on determining an optimal set of benefits prior to the CMS deadline of November 15, 2015.
The fall season is a good reality check – back to school, cooler weather, end of summer, and …. Budgeting/financial forecasting. Forecasting is like predicting the future – you have to know how to read the tea leaves and see the efficiencies and interdependencies of your current performance to have a better idea of future performance and challenges.
The signing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law threw health insurers into a whirlwind of changes. The guaranteed issue law made it so no enrollee in the individual or small group commercial market would be denied coverage due to their health status. In addition, the rate for all members now had to stay the same for all enrollees, with fluctuations only allowed for a few factors such as tobacco status. That key process, known as underwriting, could no longer serve as the method to evaluate risk and either deny coverage or set the enrollee’s premium accordingly. With that shift came the introduction of risk adjustment, reinsurance, and risk corridor (“3 Rs”) into the commercial market.
Unfortunately, Risk Adjustment does not have the luxury of taking the summer off. As CMS continues to stress the criticality of submitting complete, timely and accurate data to support plan payments related to Risk Adjustment, health plans must have year-round processes in place to ensure compliance as well as accurate payment from the government.
By now you may have received your score from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding the national sample for Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audits.